Adversarial itinerary planning
Two agents argue.
You get the better trip.
Pick a destination. Watch a slow-travel romantic and a hyper-efficient planner clash over every hour of your day. Keep the version you like best.
Meet your planners
Different philosophies.
Same trip.
The Flaneur
Slow travel"Leave room for the street that catches your eye. The best meals are never on the list."
- Prioritizes atmosphere over checkboxes
- Blocks long stretches for wandering
- Favours local haunts over tourist staples
The Completionist
Max efficiency"Every hour has a purpose. If you're walking past a landmark, you're stopping."
- Packs every slot with high-signal stops
- Optimises routes for proximity
- Never leaves a top-5 sight off the list
The process
Three rounds.
One itinerary.
Set the stage
Enter a destination, pick your trip length, and choose which model powers the debate. Hit plan.
Watch them clash
Each agent proposes, critiques, and refines. A neutral arbitrator merges their best ideas. You can inject your own preferences mid-debate.
Pick your winner
Scrub through every version, see what changed, read each agent's reasoning, and lock in the itinerary that fits your style.
Sign in to start debating
Your sessions persist. Your debates stay linked. Every version stays revisitable.
- Saved itineraries across sessions
- Version-by-version diffs
- Inject your preferences mid-debate